|
Am I that easy to figure out?
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
The complexity posed by microservices, Kubernetes, and “software-defined everything” almost necessitated that ops needed to solve many of these issues to support cloud-native development. Or take the less paved path to make all the difference
Yes, it's just more of my trying to figure out if PE is just more than new buzzwords.
At least according to this article it is - it's an elephant-load more buzzwords. I mean the buzzword density in, "Developers taking on full dev life cycle ownership and the requirement to shift left have resulted in cross-functional and operational concerns that have added even more complexity to already challenging workloads and unclear workflows." is almost enough to collapse it into a singularity.
|
|
|
|
|
Bailey Hayes, director of the Bytecode Alliance Technical Standards Committee, explains what’s new when it comes to implementing WebAssembly. Because nothing says "make the dev's life easier" like that
|
|
|
|
|
Dim var = try int.TryParse(scanf("%s",WHERE "INPUT" join <this>.<node>.key()) resume JMPQ *0x402390(,%rax,8)
Damn... I feel I have to get a shower after writing that... I will have nightmares today for sure
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The PC Security Channel used the Wireshark app to analyze network activity on two "clean" Windows installations. What's bigger than 'lots'?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: What's bigger than 'lots'?
Oodles?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: What's bigger than 'lots'?
LOTS?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
They found that the great majority of Americans don't understand the fundamentals of internet marketing practices and policies, and that many feel incapable of consenting to how companies use their data. "Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull."
And I'm certain not just Americans (but that's just who they surveyed)
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: And I'm certain not just Americans
Definitively not only americans...
I have recommended the book "Zero" by Marc Elsberg to some people and many were "really? Is that possible?" (and the book actually is a bit old)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Facebook was recently put on the spot about what they do with your information and even their engineers couldn't say how individual data was being used.
|
|
|
|
|
In the lab at least, its materials are stable for over 1,000 cycles. Time to invest in lithium
|
|
|
|
|
Time to invest in the companies that create the machines / chemical products to extract / depurate lithium
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm so happy
cause today I found my friends
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
They're in my head.
My investment is paying off already!
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft announced the upgraded search engine alongside a new Edge web browser. Microsoft is describing the combination as an ‘AI-powered copilot for the web.’ * Now with intelligence!
"The “new Bing,” as Microsoft is calling it, offers a “chat” function, where users can ask questions and receive answers from the latest version AI language model built by OpenAI." <-- because I've always wanted to chat with something about my search results.
|
|
|
|
|
So... we are going to get another annoying wave of updates misconfiguring windows settings so that bing and edge comes up again as the standard browser and search engine?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Magic 8-ball says, "Yuuuuuuupppp"
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: we are going to get another annoying wave of updates misconfiguring windows settings so that bing and edge comes up again as the standard browser and search engine?
I asked Bing and it said "No, of course not. By the way, I've got this nice bridge you might like to buy."
|
|
|
|
|
I've never experienced that.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: * Now with intelligence!
More like: Now with I.N.T.E.L.L.I.G.E.N.C.E.[^] 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
In this lawsuit, Getty alleged that Stability AI went so far as to remove Getty’s copyright management information, falsify its own copyright management information, and infringe upon Getty’s “famous trademarks” by duplicating Getty’s watermark on some images.
Generating things that look like Getty's watermark in their output is a special kind of stupid. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
Waaayyy back in the 80s I was working for a non-union print shop. One order we got was for some political dinner or similar. The client had us put a kind of small blurry oval in the corner which was intended to look a bit like a union logo. 
|
|
|
|
|
A look at what went into building the world's largest public code search index. Step 0: Find code that searches code
|
|
|
|
|
Step 1: throw away everything except what you find on Code Project. 
Seriously though, it's disturbing reading that article. When I search for code (like on StackOverflow or even my own code base) I'm parsing for meaning: does this code "mean" something similar to what I'm looking for?
It's weird (if I read the article correctly) that GitHub's code search has no concept of "meaning" - it's producing search results based strictly on n-grams.
It disturbs me that the implication is that "these things are like each other except..." can be determined by their combination of letters occurring in particular sequences rather than by an understanding of the meaning of those letters when put together as "code."
So what really is "meaningful?" Philosophers will have fun with this, but in a meaningless kind of way. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
