|
I wonder... will they cancel it next week?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
A filter got dislodged and caused issues mid-flight, Virgin Orbit CEO Dan Hart said. For lack of a filter, the rocket was lost
|
|
|
|
|
I bet that someone in the sales department was thinking "man, was I good bargaining with that provider"...
and that now thinks "damn, I hope they can't track it back to me"
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft and Adobe have partnered to integrate the Adobe Acrobat PDF rendering engine directly into the Edge browser, replacing the existing PDF engine. Does this mean Edge will start asking if you want to upgrade every time you use it?
Ohwait, it already does
|
|
|
|
|
There's a reason for this. Years ago a colleague was working on PDF manipulation code and reported that the format has no consistancy. That PDFs even render is a miracle.
|
|
|
|
|
I totally agree, had to work on PDF manipulation code as well and it's a total mess.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I guess swapping the browser core to Chrome meant Edge didn't have enough vulnerabilities so they decided to bake Acrobats into it to fix that problem and make it more pwnable.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
A new study shows how large language models like GPT-3 can learn a new task from just a few examples, without the need for any new training data. Well, that saves on future training costs then
|
|
|
|
|
That it does!
Wonder where we will find professionals in a few years time... maybe GPT would have find a way in learning to recommend the right people for the right job by then.
|
|
|
|
|
Andre Oosthuizen wrote: maybe GPT would have find a way in learning to recommend the right people for the right job by then. That would be an improvement to the most part of current headhunters' processes
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The new Teams (free) tier will require a new account. Data in the old app, now rebadged as Teams Free (classic), will be deleted. Anything you haven't saved by then will be gone, including shared files you haven't downloaded. Because there's no 'free' in Teams
|
|
|
|
|
If something is for free, you are the product.
Corollary: Only because you pay for a service, it doesn't mean, you are not the product anymore.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Good. All cloud based service need to do this on a regular basis.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: All cloud based service need to do this on a regular basis.
So that people will stop using them?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Am I that easy to figure out?
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
The complexity posed by microservices, Kubernetes, and “software-defined everything” almost necessitated that ops needed to solve many of these issues to support cloud-native development. Or take the less paved path to make all the difference
Yes, it's just more of my trying to figure out if PE is just more than new buzzwords.
At least according to this article it is - it's an elephant-load more buzzwords. I mean the buzzword density in, "Developers taking on full dev life cycle ownership and the requirement to shift left have resulted in cross-functional and operational concerns that have added even more complexity to already challenging workloads and unclear workflows." is almost enough to collapse it into a singularity.
|
|
|
|
|
Bailey Hayes, director of the Bytecode Alliance Technical Standards Committee, explains what’s new when it comes to implementing WebAssembly. Because nothing says "make the dev's life easier" like that
|
|
|
|
|
Dim var = try int.TryParse(scanf("%s",WHERE "INPUT" join <this>.<node>.key()) resume JMPQ *0x402390(,%rax,8)
Damn... I feel I have to get a shower after writing that... I will have nightmares today for sure
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The PC Security Channel used the Wireshark app to analyze network activity on two "clean" Windows installations. What's bigger than 'lots'?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: What's bigger than 'lots'? Oodles?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: What's bigger than 'lots'?
LOTS?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
They found that the great majority of Americans don't understand the fundamentals of internet marketing practices and policies, and that many feel incapable of consenting to how companies use their data. "Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull."
And I'm certain not just Americans (but that's just who they surveyed)
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: And I'm certain not just Americans Definitively not only americans...
I have recommended the book "Zero" by Marc Elsberg to some people and many were "really? Is that possible?" (and the book actually is a bit old)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Facebook was recently put on the spot about what they do with your information and even their engineers couldn't say how individual data was being used.
|
|
|
|