|
Sad about how they try to kid us like we were dumb?
Or sad about me understanding them?
And yeah, partially I find it sad that I can understand it, but I still have some hope. Since I got the SysArch role I am meeting more people that think like me in many things than I though I would. There are still not enough to be a real force, but it is a very good start.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This innovative initiative combines the power of artificial intelligence (AI) with an end-to-end security solution. AI ate my sysadmin
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one thinking "what could go wrong?" about that?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The team obviously isn't, but I imagine just about everyone else is - especially the hackers that are now drooling.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: especially the hackers that are now drooling.
They are not thinking it... for them is like christmas lottery in sommer 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid it or embrace it, code quality training permeates one's entire career. Because we've all see Chaotic Evil code
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Because we've all see Chaotic Evil code
I see your chaotic evil and I rise to lazy bastard
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
#12: Good code is obvious. We don't need 1-11.
|
|
|
|
|
When you're creating a new password in a hurry it's tempting to choose keys that are adjacent to each other on the keyboard. Go for a jog instead?
|
|
|
|
|
Every time I meet a new group of developers there are some TypeScript facts that they need to be confronted with It's still JavaScript?
|
|
|
|
|
In the last 17 months (from Jan-2022 to May-2023), DevJobsScanner has analyzed more than 14M developer jobs Your semi-regular semi-random list of programming languages for your approval/disapproval/mocking
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: DevJobsScanner has analyzed more than 14M developer jobs
A.k.a. asked chatGPT?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
At Microsoft Inspire, Meta and Microsoft announced support for the Llama 2 family of large language models (LLMs) on Azure and Windows. At least llamas won't bite your sister
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: At least llamas won't bite your sister
I hope we don't need to wipe their asses...  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Prompt engineering is the art of communicating with a generative AI model. In this article, we’ll cover how we approach prompt engineering at GitHub, and how you can use it to build your own LLM-based application. $p$g is enough of a prompt for me, no engineering required
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: $p$g is enough of a prompt for me, no engineering required
Even simpler: $$
That makes me prompt
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is planning an add-on charge of $30 per user per month for its Microsoft 365 Copilot. And it is adding a less-capable Bing Chat Enterprise offering for free for some M365 customers. I can think of a few computers it's not coming to at that (or any, really) price
|
|
|
|
|
are they going to pay me to use it? Still wouldn't be worth it.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I can think of a few computers it's not coming to at that (or any, really) price
until they push it down with an update and then charge you first on usage, or they make it intrinsic part of the 365 package and you can't say "no" anymore...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
that.
I'd wager 98% of Office is never used. Not quite sure what the point is, but in order to justify their investment, MS will give it away for enterprise customers, claiming adoption rates and fail to mention they discounted the office price by $30/month.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has shared a factsheet providing details on free tools and guidance for securing digital assets after switching to the cloud from on-premises environments. Because if you can't trust the people that keep asking for backdoors, who can you trust?
|
|
|
|
|
Sure the Government is going to help secure our code? We can trust the tools they give us right?
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
|
I mean, they don't Russia or China getting a hold of it
|
|
|
|
|
Workers using ChatGPT produced written work that was rated 18% better than those who didn't use the AI chatbot, according to MIT researchers. Assuming writing the truth doesn't matter much
|
|
|
|
|
18% of unquantifiable is what, exactly?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
