|
hi sir,
I am working on SmartCard Chip ,SCOSTA .
I have successfully created file structure in smartcard with ISO7816 specification.
while creating file structure ,i have been set security condition under Tag 8C for files.
It includes MF(Master file),under that EFs but Unable to delete file structure.
please let me know ...
How should i Delete file structure ? How should I set Security Condition for files?
How can I store variable data in smart card ?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All, I'm trying to expand my development setup. I have a win10 laptop that handles the average stuff, but being tied down with extra monitors and a real keyboard and mouse it's lost a lot of its mobility. That and a lack of desk space has got me dreaming of other expanses of unused surfaces around my apartment. I'm looking to do more embedded programming on a Linux o.s., and I currently have an ESXi host with a few vm's that can do the job. My spare laptop is an arm based chromebook. Not much I can do to connect to the vm's other than vlc and the like. Any ideas on how I could hook USB dev boards to my chromebook and program them through a remotely accessed VM ?? I haven't been able to find many tools for this purpose.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone
I am developing Localization system which requires a high timestamp resolution Access point.
If there is any recommended product has this characteristic which can timestamp the in and out bound frame in a higher resolution than 1µs.
Wi-Fi
|
|
|
|
|
AS my development machine & my test machine are 64bit windows system with Windows 7 operating System So to give myself a head start I compiled the ComPort project under Windows-driver-samples-master/serial/VirtualSerial2 sample code provided by Microsoft, initial it flashed an error that said as follows "Provider cannot be "Microsoft", must be an organization who authored INF" so I changed the following line in .inx file MSFTUMDF=Microsoft to MSFTUMDF=Sample, then it compiled successfully.
Then I follow the following process to install the driver on the target machine.
1) I copied the VirtualSerial2um.cer file VirtualSerial2um.inf from Windows-driver-samples-master\serial\VirtualSerial2\ComPort\x64\Debug & devcon.exe from C:\Program Files\Windows Kits\10\Tools\x64 to a Sample folder in the C:\ drive of the Target device.
2) Then on target machine I open the internet explorer I went to Internet Options->content->Certificates->import then I selected the VirtualSerial2um.cer file & imported the Certificate.
3) Then on target machine I opened the command prompt as Administrator, browsed to the Sample folder & typed the following command.
<b>devcon install virtualSerial2um.inf UMDF\Virtual_1 </b>
Then on the command prompt it says:
<b>device tree entry created
devcon failed</b>
In the device manager Under Unknown Device COMn(n is com port number) appears but when I open my hyper terminal COMn doesn't show on the drop down list of COM ports.
Now I am unable to figure out why my devcon installation is failing & as t says that my driver is registered in the device tree then why It is showing in the Unknown device & why not is PORTS
This is the content of the VirtualSerial2um.inf file
;
; Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation, All Rights Reserved.
;
; VirtualSerial.inf
;
;Installation Notes:
; Type "devcon install VirtualSerial2um.inf UMDF\VirtualSerial2um" to install
[Version]
Signature="$Windows NT$"
<b>Class=Ports</b>
ClassGuid={4D36E978-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318}
Provider=%MSFTUMDF%
CatalogFile=WUDF.cat
DriverVer=05/30/2016,19.7.52.160
[Manufacturer]
%MSFTUMDF%=Microsoft,NTx86
[Microsoft.NTx86]
%VirtualSerialDeviceName%=VirtualSerial_Install,UMDF\VirtualSerial2um
[SourceDisksFiles]
Virtualserial2um.dll=1
[SourceDisksNames]
1 = %MediaDescription%
; =================== UMDF VirtualSerial Device ==================================
[VirtualSerial_Install.NT]
CopyFiles=UMDriverCopy
[VirtualSerial_Install.NT.hw]
AddReg=SetDeviceType_AddReg
[VirtualSerial_Install.NT.Services]
AddService=WUDFRd,0x000001fa,WUDFRD_ServiceInstall
[VirtualSerial_Install.NT.Wdf]
UmdfService = VirtualSerial, VirtualSerial_Install
UmdfServiceOrder = VirtualSerial
UmdfKernelModeClientPolicy = AllowKernelModeClients
UmdfFileObjectPolicy = AllowNullAndUnknownFileObjects
UmdfFsContextUsePolicy = CannotUseFsContexts
[VirtualSerial_Install]
UmdfLibraryVersion=2.15.0
ServiceBinary=%12%\UMDF\Virtualserial2um.dll
[WUDFRD_ServiceInstall]
DisplayName = %WudfRdDisplayName%
ServiceType = 1
StartType = 3
ErrorControl = 1
ServiceBinary = %12%\WUDFRd.sys
[SetDeviceType_AddReg]
HKR,,DeviceType,0x10001,0x0000001b ; 0x1b = FILE_DEVICE_SERIAL_PORT
[DestinationDirs]
UMDriverCopy=12,UMDF ; copy to drivers\UMDF
[UMDriverCopy]
Virtualserial2um.dll
; =================== Generic ==================================
[Strings]
MSFTUMDF="Sample"
MediaDescription="Microsoft Sample Driver Installation Media"
WudfRdDisplayName="Windows Driver Foundation - User-mode Driver Framework Reflector"
VirtualSerialDeviceName="Microsoft VirtualSerial Sample (UMDF 2)
Could anyone please guide me in the correct direction
|
|
|
|
|
I am searching for all btle devices with BluetoothLEAdvertisementWatcher.
It works fine but I need a device handle so I can use GATT api's.
How do I get a device handle from the information provided in BluetoothLEAdvertisementReceivedEventArgs?
“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”
― Henry Ford
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think I am going to get this working.
It seems GATT comms is only possible if the device is already paired. And there is no api for paring programmatically. 
Perhaps I can do it on android.
“If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”
― Henry Ford
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a WDM upperfilter driver for some class devices(WPD, Printers). The wdm upper filter is from WDK generic toaster filter sample. The problem that I have is for some device that support or install UMDF drivers I receive STATUS DEVICE CONFIGURATION_ERROR at IRP_MN_START_DEVICE and device failed to start. Can you help me please or give me an advice?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WDF = UMDF + KMDF (user moder driver + kernel mode driver)
|
|
|
|
|
And the toaster samples are kernel drivers.
So how can you load a kernel filter on a usermode driver?
|
|
|
|
|
You don't understand.
I'm an upper filter driver(KERNEL) over a device class that use in his stack an UMDF driver...
|
|
|
|
|
The driver is in usermode. You cant run kernel code (the filter) in user mode, and vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
Without the UMDF my filter works
|
|
|
|
|
You mean it works when you load it onto the toaster driver.
Of course it will.
However kernel code cant run in user mode, and a UMDF driver is user mode. Therefore the toaster filter driver, which is kernel code, cant be used on your UMDF driver.
You really have no idea what you are doing do you? You don't even understand the concept of user mode and kernel?
|
|
|
|
|
My friend:
I have a WDM filter driver, based on WDK toaster sample, that I am using to filter portable devices (mainly Phones), as upper filter. During AddDevice phase, I am querying device properties (such Description, Manufacturer and so on) and then attaching to device. I can see the IRP_MN_START_DEVICE, which I send down to next lower driver after setting a completion routine. This is working fine on most of the machines I am testing on, but on some systems (every XP and some Windows 7 and Server 2008), when I send the IRP_MN_START_DEVICE down to next driver, I get a STATUS_DEVICE_CONFIGURATION_ERROR, so this is preventing the device from being installed in the first place. I have managed to overcome this error by editing the hardware ID registry key for the device and creating "UpperDriverOk" and "KernelModeClientPolicy" values, setting them to 1. This way the device starts without issues and I can filter it as normal. Now, I am aware of Portable Devices being managed by an UMDF driver, but does that explains the issue with Start Device phase? I haven't found any differences between those systems with the issue and those that are working fine without needing the "registry values" workaround. Is there any system setting or service configuration that might be helping (or ruining) this filtering scenario? Would it be possible to apply the "KernelModeClientPolicy" workaround for the whole system and not separately for every single Phone device?
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I wasn't so clear 
|
|
|
|
|
No, you didn't explain yourself at all well.
I have no idea what the cause of your failure is.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok.
Thank you for your time.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I've googled. I have the need to "program" SD Cards with an application deployment image. We've had some issues with reliably getting factory employees to properly program these SD cards - actually started with Windows Explorer. In any event, I now have a script that makes use of chkdsk and xcopy to expand the production image onto an SD Card.
However, there are random times (less than 1%) where the process fails. Following the xcopy command, the chkdsk might fail with a variety of errors:
1) "filename" first allocation unit is not valid. The entry will be truncated.
2) "filename" entry contains a nonvalid link. The size of <filename> entry is not valid.
I really don't expect xcopy to generate these errors. We're using commercial grade SD card readers (like you'd buy off Newegg or Amazon).
Any ideas or suggestions?
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
Have you checked that they are all correctly formatted as NTFS?
|
|
|
|
|
This is strictly FAT32. The SD cards go into an embedded system.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
That are file system errors. They may be sourced by faulty SD cards or by a reader that has problems with specific SD card types.
If you got such errors sometimes I would not only perform a chkdsk but also a binary file compare on all files. Doing so you might find more unusable cards.
With disk images you may also create an image file and write that to the cards using an image writer utility (again followed by a verify that performs a binary comparison). While this takes more time it avoids the need of formatting and gives you identical images.
Because the error rate is below 1% you might live with it and dispose the faulty SD cards or try to reduce the error rate by using other SD cards and/or readers.
|
|
|
|
|
Correct - all file system errors. For another product, we have a tool that does just as you suggest. Factory people get in a hurry, and I think some of the problems are due to pulling the card too soon.
thanks for the info
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
definition of type secondary storage and give the example and the picture
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12192903 wrote:
definition of type secondary storage and give the
example and the picture
A watch, example can be found here[^].
More seriously, Google has a list of sites explaining your question. One answer is here[^], with picture.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
