|
How one can indulge in your this project/// most important to ask..is this requirement still alive?
- Happy Coding -
Vishal Vashishta
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, I'm glad to see the feedback  The project is still alive. I have done 1st beta version already, but it was not so good as I wanted. So, now I rewriting almost everything (memory management, caclucating methods e.t.c.). I have my own vision of how library will work. If you want to participate, can you subcscribe on this message? I will send you beta version or api reference, or I will create a thread in the forum for a little discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
CodeProject is currently working with a professor at Oregon State University to better understand what makes components reusable. In this paid study, we will ask you to identify up to 5 components on the CodeProject.com website that you have tried to use, and to describe whether it was easy or hard to use each. You would be able to do the study via an online interactive chat or a telephone, at your choice. As compensation, you would receive $10 for each component that you tell about (via PayPal).
If you've got a few minutes to spare, then you can read more about the study at http://experiments.eecs.oregonstate.edu/general/components/
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
modified 18-May-12 10:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
(This is a duplicate of the same topic in Design and Architecture Discussion Board, as the only anser there was a suggestion that I'd better post this here)
Hello 2 all!
I would like to run or participate in a project of compiler (or, maybe, a translator, or an interpretter). During last months I have gained some skills in this area and would like to enlarge them. Now I started writing a compiler of a C-like language with extended capabbilities (maybe, something will be borrowed from Python) right into the machine code (previously I wrote a translator of a C-like code into MASM, compiled programs worked well, so I do have some background). Though, it will be hard to make it alone, maybe by myself I can gather less clear ideas the compiled language could look like. So I would like to find a partner, or maybe just join some beginning project like mine. Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
I am looking for collaborators for a Document Management Programme that also has an interface with AutoCAD. I have coded about 80% and debugged about 50%.
I am a retired architect, but I have been writing code ever since Fortran 2.
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings.
I am currently working on a little project for fun; I am trying to have a webcam work in C#, probably by using directshow.
But I am so clueless!
I don't understand the code enough to write my own from scratch so I am seeking someone who masters C# to show Me what I need.
This would work best on MSN; ADEPofArts@gmail.com
Thank You for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting your email address in a public internet forum is not a great idea... unless you like spam. I'd suggest you remove that, people can still answer you in the forum or email you indirectly through CodeProject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't DOWNLOAD it. please another servers.
/* LIFE RUNS ON CODE */
|
|
|
|
|
you can download. read the instructions on the main page. right-click on the download I think but read instructions. I haven't updated in a while but works good except bad 7zip 64 bit file I think.
|
|
|
|
|
http://code.google.com/p/win7e/source/browse/trunk/Output/Win7Esetupv1.zip (click "View raw file" link and then save the zip file then extract it and run it.)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for new link. i will Test it as soon as possible my friend 
/* LIFE RUNS ON CODE */
|
|
|
|
|
Need people to test out the project management and organization tools at www.softwaremonkeys.net.
Register then create, plan, and organise your projects, while collaborating with others.
People can vote and post messages on various aspects of projects and plans so projects can be driven by the community.
You can download the WorkHub code and install it on your own servers or use the free hosted installation at www.softwaremonkeys.net.
Please use the links at the bottom of each page to report issues and post suggestions.
|
|
|
|
|
I was checking out the website and navigation on the left side of the screen is really wonky in IE9. I have to put my cursor almost between the navigation items to get the sub menus to work and it is a really small space. Putting my cursor on the word doesn't work so I can never access your sub menus.
I was interested in looking at your software but I am losing interest quickly because I didn't see any screenshots of what your software looks like. I realize what you are working on is in beta so maybe screenshots are not available but they would have helped me make a decision on whether or not to download/use your application.
Brett A. Whittington
Application Developer
|
|
|
|
|
You can view the screenshots generated during each automated build and release here:
http://www.softwaremonkeys.net/screenshots/[^]
I'm aware of the issue with the menu but haven't figured out why it's happening yet. It seems strange that Microsoft's own browser doesn't work with one of their own ASP.NET menu controls when firefox does.
It's even worse because in some versions of IE I've had it work, but it others it doesn't. And in Chrome it works....most of the time.
I've decided to abandon HTML and JavaScript for the next version, as much as possible.
I'm planning a new version with a silverlight interface, which should help get around the traditional browser compatibility issues and make the whole application a lot more efficient and enjoyable to use.
I'm investigating the possibilities of making the navigation and organization more visual and intuitive, using some of the new features silverlight offers.
I've built a new dependency injection system for the new version and I'm in the process of building a new, more scalable data storage system (built on RavenDB instead of db4o).
The new version will use a lot of existing code and concepts but it's being completely re-organised and refactored from the ground up to make it even more efficient to work with.
I'll post more info once I have at least a prototype of the new version.
modified 20-Feb-12 20:50pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It's available if anyone wants to play:
http://www.paddedwall.org/camopicker/downloads/camopickersetup.msi
It's a 6.6MB download.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
It says in the Start Menu "Shortcut to primary output from CameoPicker". What installer are you using?
Works[^] on Weven, will try it on SUSE somewhere this week.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using the Visual Studio Setup Project template. It looks like I still have some tweaking to do in there. (The desktop icon does the same thing.)
I wouldn't get too excited about Linux. If there's something wrong that takes longer than a few minutes to fix for Linux, it ain't gonna happen before the first of the year, and even then, someone else would have to test it.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
I wouldn't get too excited about Linux. If there's something wrong that takes longer than a few minutes to fix for Linux, it ain't gonna happen before the first of the year, and even then, someone else would have to test it.
Yeah, and Mono isn't the primary concern of Xamarin.
It's still fun to see a .NET app on something different from Windows. I'm wondering if it'd work on a MacBook Pro?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
|
|
|
|
|
Posted a preview of the upcoming version. If you have comments about the UI, feel free to blast away.
CamoPicker v2 preview[^]
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
As a disinterested party (i.e. would never use the software) but interested in GUI design, my 2c
The tabs in the control layer seem to be ok , not too many of them and the contents look like they're obviously related - but I can imagine a user having to switch between tabs frequently while they play around with colours.
You seem to have two panels headed 'select Paint System' on the General tab, which may be confusing
Personally, looking at the form layout, I would probably make each of the user controls (for I assume that's what they are) collapsible and and re-positionable, and have only one tab (plus maybe the info tab - you don't show that in the screen shot so can't tell)
That way the user can collapse any controls they don't want to see, and drag controls to the top for those they do want to see and use 'right now'
You could also allow them to be re-sized, avoiding the need for scroll bars on some of them...
Then if you wanted to be flash you could have them dockable - so the user could drag them out into their own windows...
It'd make a nice article too - generic dockable sortable collabsible and draggable user controls...
|
|
|
|
|
_Maxxx_ wrote: The tabs in the control layer seem to be ok , not too many of them and the contents look like they're obviously related - but I can imagine a user having to switch between tabs frequently while they play around with colours.
That would only be an issue on the advanced form, but it I don't see a resolution to that.
_Maxxx_ wrote: You seem to have two panels headed 'select Paint System' on the General tab, which may be confusing
The "General" tab is on the simple form, and I simply couldn't think of a better name for it since it holds ALL of the controls on a single tab that had to be broken into different tabs on the advanced form.
The idea is that they will either use the advanced for or the simple form, but not both. In fact, each form is its own version of the same thing.
_Maxxx_ wrote: Personally, looking at the form layout, I would probably make each of the user controls (for I assume that's what they are) collapsible and and re-positionable, and have only one tab (plus maybe the info tab - you don't show that in the screen shot so can't tell)
I can't make them collapsible because one of the tab pages has so many (large) controls on it that they wouldn't fit in the space available.
_Maxxx_ wrote: Then if you wanted to be flash you could have them dockable - so the user could drag them out into their own windows...
To be honest, I was considering making the weapon panel (the panel that shows the environment image with the weapon overlay) a floating window, separate from the controls, but I figured that if someone was already complaining about the size of the app, it wouldn't make much sense to go through the hassle of tying the two forms together.
Thanks for the input. Even though I essentially shot down all your ideas, it gave me stuff to think about, and that's a good thing.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I followed the link to your v.2. screen-shots, when I downloaded the program I got version 1.0.1.1, which has the older interface.
I couldn't comment on the v.2. interface without having a chance to use it.
But, I'm certainly in no hurry
best, Bill
"I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." Bjarne Stroustrop circa 1990
|
|
|
|
|
v1.0.1.1 is the latest version available to users. Version 2.0 is under development, and link merely shows screen shots.
BillWoodruff wrote: But, I'm certainly in no hurry
Is that because 1.0 seems to be good enough, or because 1.0 sucks so bad that you're assuming v2 must be even worse.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Is that because 1.0 seems to be good enough, or because 1.0 sucks so bad that you're assuming v2 must be even worse.
Well that's a question puts me between the Devil and the deep blue sea
The answer is: none of above: I'm just curious to see how your new interface works in action. I like to try things before I make comments.
best, Bill
"I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." Bjarne Stroustrop circa 1990
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
