|
Hi Guys
me again, old man again .. I have used Scanner set as com port and I like to change it to use Bluetooth, used as com port.
I have register device and change it to use it as com port in Windows 11. I am using SerialPort and add
SerialErrorReceivedEventHandler . This event never happens. I cannot find any suggestion. Can you help me please ?
Regards John
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 1947 wrote: This event never happens. Perhaps there are no errors.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard.
no errors, The Receive Data Event not working. the com port is in /foreach(string port in ports) / as well it shows as com port in Device Manager as 'Standard Serial over Bluetooth link (COM4)'. I use standard Serial port structure <serialport(port)>. It works as HID, when I scan barcode while in Note Pad ?!!?? In device manager I have its HID disabled. When I change the driver to do as com port, my software works. I have an issue with the com port driver supplied with the scanner, and this is the reason I like to change it.
Regards John
|
|
|
|
|
If it is a problem with the device you are connecting to then there is very little anyone here can do to help.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard
maybe I have not been clear. I do not want to use the faulty driver as it has problems. This is why I like to use Scanner via Bluetooth and redirected to operate as com port. The Bluetooth driver is Microsoft and redirection is done via Windows 11, so no faulty driver to be used.
regards John
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, maybe I am being dense, but I still do not understand what you are asking for.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard
I want to use Bluetooth connection and use it to communicate as serial port with <serialdatareceivedeventhandler> to operate. Maybe I am asking for something which cannot be done
appreciate you help
regards John
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard
Yes this is what I am using, but the event is never triggered. Serial port exists.
thanks again
regards John
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard
great, yes this is how I use it, only I would like to use DataReceiveEvent. I will try to do it using the loop, may be this is the solution.
Thanks you very much
Regards John
|
|
|
|
|
I have used OData in my asp.net core project. I have problem with nullable foreign keys. When I want to use expand in url query, there is an exception that says:
System.InvalidOperationException: Nullable object must have a value.
I have provided a simple reproducible project in GitHub GitHub - codeblock88/temp: This repository is used for debugging.[^]repository.
Please help me to solve this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
If a key is nullable then how can it be used to maintain referential integrity?
|
|
|
|
|
I want to expand it for records are not null.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not "records" that can be null, but individual fields in the record.
You're not making much sense, so you're going to have to do a much better job of explaining what you're trying to do.
As for the error you're getting, show the code that's throwing it.
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what you mean by that, or what it has to do with your original question.
|
|
|
|
|
There's nothing in that project that would actually call your API and produce that error. Where's the actual reproduction of the error?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
"Nullable foreign keys". Sounds like the definition of an orphan.
(You need a "null' parent in those cases; if you want to stay sane)
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Replace the null with a zero and filter them out in your query.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys,
I am not expert and will be glad to get some help. I wrote software, where I am using Barcode reader, com port, in number of Windows forms. I am switching receive data on Form Activation and disabling it on Form deactivated. it has worked well for number of months, but now I am occasionally get error, Com port is not accessible. Received I use Invoke.
<pre> private void CheckForUsbDevice()
{
string[] ports = SerialPort.GetPortNames();
foreach (string port in ports)
{
if ((port == "COM3") || (port == "COM4"))
{
if (AcdStart.mySerialPort == null)
{
AcdStart.mySerialPort = new SerialPort(port)
{
BaudRate = 9600,
Parity = Parity.None,
StopBits = StopBits.One,
DataBits = 8,
Handshake = Handshake.None,
RtsEnable = true
};
}
AcdStart.mySerialPort.DataReceived += new SerialDataReceivedEventHandler(DataReceivedHandler);
if (!AcdStart.mySerialPort.IsOpen)
{
AcdStart.mySerialPort.Close();
AcdStart.mySerialPort.Open();
}
PortTextBox.Text = (string.Format("Port {0}", port));
break;
}
}
}
private void RxPurchaseOrder_Deactivate(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
if ((AcdStart.mySerialPort != null) && (AcdStart.mySerialPort.IsOpen))
AcdStart.mySerialPort.DiscardInBuffer();
if (AcdStart.mySerialPort != null)
{
AcdStart.mySerialPort.DataReceived -= new SerialDataReceivedEventHandler(DataReceivedHandler);
AcdStart.mySerialPort.Close();
}
AcdStart.mySerialPort = null;
PauseNow = true;
this.BackColor = Color.LightSalmon;
}
private void RxPurchaseOrder_Activated(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if ((AcdStart.mySerialPort != null) && (AcdStart.mySerialPort.IsOpen))
{
AcdStart.mySerialPort.DiscardInBuffer();
if (AcdStart.mySerialPort.IsOpen)
AcdStart.mySerialPort.Close();
AcdStart.mySerialPort = null;
}
PortTextBox.Text = "";
CheckForUsbDevice();
PauseNow = false;
this.BackColor = Color.LightSteelBlue;
}
I hope I have indicated flow of the basics. I am self learning pensioner ... apologize in advance and thanks for any help and suggestions.
regards John
|
|
|
|
|
What is the exact error message, and where is it generated?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard
The error is, "Access to com port denied". as it is very hard to debug it but it happens on Open port call. I have done some changes, leave com port assigned and only remove or add SerialDataRceivedEventHandler. I feel it is still not the good way, but is working.
regards John
|
|
|
|
|
You have a "number of forms", and imply that each form is opening and closing the port on activation / deactivation. I maintain the serial port should not be dependent on "forms"; and should be part of the app's start and stop process (and "interval" / wait processing).
The port should be "wrapped" in such a way that it can be shared by the various forms / processes.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Garry
thanks for your reply. As I was unable to find some example, this is how I have created. I feel it is not good way, as I done it, as there is a lot of areas which is unpredictable. I will try to see. what I can do. If you have some link to give me some link to example, will be very much appreciated. I fully agree with Napoleon and like the internet and Code Project, to learn.
thanks for great help.
Regards John
|
|
|
|
|