|
it now looks fine indeed.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
@Sean-Ewington
I remember this guy[^] from a couple of conversations... you even jumped in in one of them[^]
He is back with a new version of his project[^]...
Should we get a step back or keep an eye on it?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 11-Dec-21 17:32pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I would say keep an eye on new content.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
As highlighted in QA, this article[^] has an expired link. The link to "download ResEdit from [here]" points to an expired domain, which could very easily be taken over by a site hosting malware.
The author appears to be long gone, and the article isn't much use without the missing download. Is it worth keeping the article with the link removed, or would it make more sense to remove the article?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Good catch! In this case, we should remove the article.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
The article itself may come in handy for someone in the future that's looking for information on the subject.
Maybe keep the article with the removed links?
|
|
|
|
|
What's the best (easiest) way to make a minor update to an article I wrote that's already published?
Would be nice if I could somehow grab the whole HTML of the article, make the minor update (in HTML), and submit the revised version for publication.
How would I do that? (Or is there another way?)
|
|
|
|
|
1. Mouse over your user name at the top right and select "My Articles" from the drop-down menu.
2. Find your article in the list and open it by clicking on it.
3. Click on "Update Your article" at the upper right.
4. Now you're in the article editor. In the toolbar, click on "Source" toward the end of the first row to see the HTML version.
5. Make your change(s).
6. Click on "Preview" to check your work.
7. Fill in the "Briefly comment on what was changed" box, but this isn't really necessary for a minor edit.
8. Check "I have read and agree to the contributor's agreement" and click "Publish".
|
|
|
|
|
How do I mark a solution?
|
|
|
|
|
It depends how you want to mark it. Move your mouse over the word "Solution" or the stars at the top, or the flags at the bottom. The popup messages should help you.
|
|
|
|
|
I do not see the word "Solution", stars, or flags - see <a href="https://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5838074/Re-How-do-I-create-xy-plots-with-WPF-APP-NET-Frame">Re: How do I create xy plots with WPF APP (.NET Framework)? - WPF Discussion Boards</a>[<a href="https://www.codeproject.com/Messages/5838074/Re-How-do-I-create-xy-plots-with-WPF-APP-NET-Frame" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
|
|
|
|
|
That is a forum message; I assumed you were referring to a Quick Answers Solution. But it is not really clear what you want to do. If you just want to show the question has been resolved, then you should edit the original message and add "[Solved]" to the title.
|
|
|
|
|
curious: Get Chunky Now[^]
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretically any votes you got while the article was in moderation shouldn't count. I'm actually not sure if your articles would go into moderation. But at least according to the server times listed here, your article went live 2:56 and the first vote came in at 4:16.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
thanks, Sean, Perhaps i did a revision, but, hadn't submitted it yet.
cheers, Bill
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: I'm actually not sure if your articles would go into moderation. they should not, he has more than rep enough besides the badgets.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a forum that handles C# WPF questions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
you can search on google by using this query intext:"c# wpf"
|
|
|
|
|
My common email adr is <cte677@gmail.com>.
When I request an password sent to <cte677@gmail.com>, I see "Unable to find your information."
When I attempt to create an account using <cte677@gmail.com>, I see "This email is in use."
Please advise.
|
|
|
|
|
This kind of message should go to the Bugs and Suggestions[^] forum.
Maybe @Sean-Ewington or @Chris-Maunder can move it there and dig a bit about it?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm afraid I don't see an account under the email. Is there another email you might have used?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. Can <cte677@gmail.com> 1) be restored, or 2) deleted so I can create a new account with that email adr? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Because I cannot access it, I cannot restore or delete it, I'm afraid.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|