|
Is there a way I can have sections in the article that can collapsed/expanded ? One-level (no nesting) deep is fine.
thanks, Bill
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
At this time we do not have this functionality, I'm afraid.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
If you're editing the raw HTML, the <details> element[^] might work. (Assuming the editor doesn't remove it.)
<details>
<summary>A collapsible section</summary>
...
</details>
A collapsible section
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
cool ! thanks
«The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch
|
|
|
|
|
I have an article draft and uploaded a zip file and inserted link to article.
In Preview on link click I get always:
No download file specified?
What can I do?
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately you won't be able to download the article in the preview, but once the article is live, you will.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
ok, good to know.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I get the message "Too many tags. There is a limit of 8." when I'm trying to update some old articles. Could you please tell me why? Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much for your message. Because we've changed the taxonomy on the site to being set by tags rather than by sections, we've tried to narrow the focus of the tags on each article. The message is meant to only allow article updates and new articles to have a maximum of eight tags. If you'd like help in narrowing the tags on your article please let me know and I'd be happy to help.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've edited the tags. Basically I took out the tags that were either already covered, not as valuable in terms of users finding your article, and didn't quite apply. If you'd like a tag by tag breakdown, I'd be happy to discuss.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please let me know when you are ready to publish and I will see if I get the error.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a class just for tables. Inside just put <table class="ArticleTable"> and you'll be using the design used for all tables on CodeProject.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I will try it out. Thanks for the response.
|
|
|
|
|
Sweet!!! I just added the class to the existing table in my article and now it looks great[^].
thanks again!
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. Someone who actually documents arcane command line stuff!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't done DB work but still found your story hilarious.
After I started to use GUIs as a user, I never wanted to see command line stuff again. Ever. When Apple Macs came out, we used them for everything but development, which was on terminals hosted by IBM mainframes. When Unix workstations replaced the terminals, I was not pleased. Eventually I got up to speed, by why this suffering? With GUIs, you just poke around and figure out how to do most things without even reading the documentation. It was the same with MS-DOS. Having used a Mac, I thought it was total crap.
Of course, the software that I develop only has a command line interface. The problem with GUIs is that they're platform specific and add even more boilerplate, which C++ already provides enough of.
|
|
|
|
|
I want to offer some content to CodeProject as sponsored articles, is there any way can help me? Or who I can contact for more specific information?
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be happy to put you in contact with someone from our Sales Team. I'm forwarding them your information.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, please contact me as soon as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] got approved, but there are some <span>'s and a couple of tags more in the snippets that shouldn't be there.
Could someone tidy it up a bit? Thanks
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I think ... the author fixed it?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|