|
Do you delete the link in competition article, please? Last time I edited something, it went a bit bad
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, which link?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Getting Started with PouchDB - Part 1[^] this guy has been warned about using links and still is writing publicity about his blog in the articles (see the last sentence in the summary). It is not and has been not been a blog, all versions were articles.
Article says: For more information about PouchDB, check out my blog located at LINK.
Additionally...
(Getting Started with PouchDB - Part 2[^]) is still using link shortener ["In my last article here on CodeProject.com, https://bit.ly/2Mjy3kp, you learned to insert..."] and same link to learn more in his blog.
Getting Started with PouchDB - Part 3[^] a link shortener again in ["The pouchdb-find plug-in can be downloaded at https://bit.ly/2s1AoYp..."] (this time without blog link)
In Security in Angular - Part 2[^] another link shortener in ["I am not going to explain this code as it is well documented at http://bit.ly/2GYt1H3..."] (My warning almost 3 weeks ago was ignored)
And I have not checked the fed Blogs
Sean Ewington said: I've messaged Paul a few times about the links. We don't have a dialogue yet, I would say, if he doesn't react, maybe a short deactivation or something similar? Other users would have been nuked sooner with such behavior.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 7-Feb-19 1:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose the author chose wrong flags.
Install Apache Spark on your windows system with dependencies[^]
contains:Quote: Editorial Note
Having trouble writing or posting articles? These articles aim to gather together tips and tricks from authors and mentors to help you write great articles. but has nothing to do with the resources / FAQ articles
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I suppose the author chose wrong flags.
Yeah, the note is automatically added based on the "Author Resources" section. An Editor will have to change the section.
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Daniels wrote: Yeah, the note is automatically added based on the "Author Resources" section. An Editor will have to change the section. IMHO it would actually make more sense, if the self selected section "Author Resources" would just rise a flag, that someone with correct rights had to confirm that it actually is something that belongs to the section and hence deserves the editorial note or not.
The amount of "false positives" is bigger than the number of real "Author resources"
EDIT: I just did a quick check out of curiosity... In the first glance:
Authenticate .NET Core Client of SQL Server with Integrated Security from Linux Docker Container[^]
ASP.NET Gridview in Web Forms using Bootstrap 4[^]
Easy prototyping with desktop console like UI, Skia drawings and several REST like node.js hosted services[^]
Full-Featured visual scripting environment for R & Data Science[^]
Creating a custom de/serializer[^]
How to Obtain Continuous Integration using Visual Studio with No Cost[^]
F l o w e r m a t r i x c o m p o s i t i o n in Python[^]
Building Apache-tika Project using Eclipse[^]
The Structure of import Library File (.lib)[^]
x64 API Hooker + Disassembler[^]
GraphQuery - Powerful Text Query Language[^]
SketchIt - A Brief Introduction[^]
Simple Way to Get Comma Delimited Values from a Field by Using SQL[^]
Integrate Firebase Phone Authentication With Laravel[^]
Tips and tricks for navigating large codebases[^]
Continuous Integration and Delivery for Beginners (DevOps)[^]
Writing a C# Multilingual UWP Application in VS2017[^]
EDIT 2: After cleaning the filter...
MVC Area Routing [^] <<< Marked as deleted, but still in the list. Not sure if visible for me due to protector... someone check please?
Cool Trick to Delete All Sub Folder and Files in a Windows Folder, Super Fast![^]
Some Useful Tips and Tricks of iPhone Apps[^]
List of freely available programming books[^] <<< could remain, but being strict has nothing to do with posting in CP
Extensions for Visual Studio[^]
Google Charting API and Formula Imaging[^]
HTML5 for Asp.net & C# Developers[^]
How to Delete a Project from www.VisualStudio.com TFS[^]
Microsoft Word Tips & Tricks[^] <<< could be considered helpful for writing in word, but not sure if related to publish in CP (IMO not)
EDIT 3: This one is the one from the moderation queue (just to fill the list in one message):
Install Apache Spark on your windows system with dependencies[^]
all those are in the resources list being not related to the topic and I am not sure if they are all since I am having problems with the tag filter (going to B&S after this)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 30-Jan-19 8:52am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
posted in B&S:
Bugs and Suggestions[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
@OriginalGriff did you forget your today?
You have approved them with the formatting errors
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Oops.
Of to the kitchen Griff!
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you to all CodeProject staff - you're doing a great job. Final wish - could we fix the fat gif i have in my article? It's the only gif in the article and present demo in final form. I guess you are using some tool for resizing the images and this tool just took the first frame of the gif, resize it and place it there.
Please, let me know if I should upload a smaller gif or we can go with the main one and just set width=600px for it?
|
|
|
|
|
Please send me your gif and I will place it in the article sean@codeproject.com
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
How long does it takes for an article submitted via Submission page to be approved - it is said usually very quick. What does this very quick means - one hour, one business day, etc?
|
|
|
|
|
It varies: but it;'s generally hours rather than days. But all the moderation is done by volunteers (and the criteria to become an article moderator includes authoring articles, so we understand both how difficult it can be, and how frustrating it can be to have it sit there doing nothing) and it will depend on which moderators are available and have time to read it.
For most articles, a good degree of familiarity with the subject matter is obviously needed - and that can mean that it waits until sufficient skilled moderators can read it properly.
That can take time: not normally too long, there are quite a few of us! Have a little patience, your article in the moderation queue is quite long and takes a little reading. And moderation is more than a quick scan and hit approve; moreover it takes a number of moderators to agree that the article is (or isn't) suitable for publication: that it is accurate, informed, useful, not plagiarised, and not spam - and to point out problems that need fixing if any are found.
We moderators aren't here to make your life difficult, or to be nasty - quite the reverse, we protect the site from not-ready articles, and authors from the derision and downvotes that poorer articles can receive. And to be a moderator, you have to write articles, so we know what it feels like when you slave away on something and Joe Moron from Stupidity High School, Kansas finds out it's not what he needs to hand in as his homework ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry, it's OK, I agree with you 100%. I just wanted to have a rough idea, I have been making this article for few day, step by step, so for me it's not a problem to wait day or two, just wanted to see how the process go.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that's correct, I am re-uploading them at the moment. They were not shown anyway
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, now I can see them in draft version, but they are still not shown in article.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
New to CodeProject and I flubbed my first article attempt--have re-written it and am trying to resubmit, but it remains closed and the date last updated isn't changing.
Clearly I'm missing something... Have tried searching FAQs and such, striking out...
Please let me know the right way to proceed.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have code to attach to your article? That's seems to be all that's missing.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
It's attached as a zip file... not the right way to do it?
|
|
|
|
|
I mixed up the instructions for emailing an article with the instructions for the wizard?
Just hit the "add attachment to article" button--sure I missed that before, and resubmitted... but still show's last update as the original date of submission... ?
modified 23-Jan-19 14:16pm.
|
|
|
|
|